{"id":27588,"date":"2018-06-23T20:03:21","date_gmt":"2018-06-24T00:03:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wadesarver.com\/Podcast\/?p=27588"},"modified":"2018-06-23T20:04:25","modified_gmt":"2018-06-24T00:04:25","slug":"will-tower-workers-safely-handle-the-next-deployment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wadesarver.com\/Podcast\/2018\/06\/will-tower-workers-safely-handle-the-next-deployment\/","title":{"rendered":"Will Tower Workers Safely handle the Next Deployment?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"COP<\/a>Looking at all the work that is coming up in 2019 through 2022, will the tower workers be protected? You may be asking, protected from what? I would say from the horrible scheduling that they had to deal with in the past. Couple that with work ramping up which adds inexperienced climbers that need better training. The shortage of workers out there. From the carriers that pushed the GCs so hard knowing that they were untouchable. Even tower owners rarely get in trouble; it\u2019s a problem that compounds.\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The carriers have done a lot to make sure they were untouchable with the layers of GCs between them and the climber. So many layers, but the climber is working off the documentation and direction of the carrier, no one else. The FCC and OSHA know this, and due to recent changes, carriers may not be protected like they once were. With the AT&T lawsuit, https:\/\/wade4wireless.com\/2018\/06\/04\/what-the-att-30m-payout-to-an-injured-climber-means-to-future-work\/<\/a> maybe lawyers will look to suing carriers more. While there were more circumstances in the lawsuit than just the carrier, the new standard is set. While not many lawyers will go up against a carrier unless they think they can win, it opens a door. However, tower ownership matters. Will the tower owners become more involved in making tower safer? That lawsuit was specifically about the tower. It could have been any tower owner.\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Ah yes, the tower owners who rely on contractors to let them know if the tower is safe or not. Again, it is a clean way for them to pass the responsibility onto the tower. I know they say they want every tower to be as safe as possible, but more safety comes at a price. A price that most should think long and hard before paying, after all, what is a person\u2019s life worth?<\/p>\n

The carriers joining NATE shows that they acknowledge that there is a problem, that\u2019s good news. They were quick to get involved in the rulemaking for training climbers. Yet, they don\u2019t employ many climbers, if any, do they? Although, they are responsible for (I\u2019m guessing) 85% (or more) of the work out there. You see, the way I see it when they joined NATE, they were quick to help any way they could to prevent future accidents. While the one thing that I saw prevented accidents was the downturn of work. It\u2019s not that the work is no longer there, it\u2019s that the schedules are not crazy. They are not pounding climbers into the ground. A key factor in fewer accidents is a realistic schedule and a trained workforce.<\/p>\n

Carriers hire the GCs or OEMs that hires the climbers. The GCs and OEMs are full of PMs that work with the field crews. They are the ones that bear the burden of the project succeeding or failing.\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The PMs are the ones that not only deal with all the problems in the field coming back from the climbers complaining but the changes in schedule and sites from the carrier. They hear crap from both ends, a task that takes its toll on their time, energy, and good spirits.<\/p>\n

Will this all change in 2019 and 2020 and Massive MIMO and 5G rollout? What about the growth of fixed wireless? Will these upgrades start to strain the industry again? Was the last downturn enough to get the less than reputable companies out of business? I guess we will see in 2019, won\u2019t we?<\/p>\n

I have heard how the tower climbing workforce will be at full capacity in 2019. So much so that the prices of crews will go higher and higher. Maybe they can cash in for the next 2 years. That\u2019s if T-Mobile and Sprint roll out the way they say they’re going to. Also, AT&T must commit to building the FirstNet system the way they promised to.<\/p>\n

I remain skeptical. Promises were made to be broken. We may not see all the work hit at once, but then again, maybe we will. I don\u2019t mean to be wishy-washy, but we should face facts that there are a lot of factors holding them back. Many things, if not all, are out of the climber’s control.<\/p>\n

What could hold back production? I am glad you asked, let me count the ways.\"Tower<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n